A 400-year-old Warning against Wars of Intervention

Most of America’s wars during the past century have been justified on the basis that we were coming to the aid of oppressed peoples and liberating them, which, incidentally, is the same justification the Romans used for most of their imperial expansion.  The abuse of this justification has often led me to wonder whether such intervention is ever justified, and so I was intrigued to find the discussion of the question in Quaestio IV of the Vindiciae Contra TyrannosAlthough he is actually about to argue in favor of foreign intervention on behalf of oppressed citizens, particularly Christians, Mornay begins by offering a very insightful caution: 

“And indeed there are many who have readily judged it to be lawful, once they have hoped to augment their own wealth by affording assistance.  For in this way the Romans, Alexander the Great, and many others frequently extended their frontiers on the pretext of repressing tyrants.  Not long ago we saw Henri II, king of France, waging war on Charles V under the pretence of delivering and defending the princes of the Empire, and Protestant ones at that; just as also Henry VIII, king of England, was ready to render assistance to the Protestants of Germany, in order to create trouble for Charles V.  But if there is danger to be feard, or little profit may be hoped for, then you will certainly hear most princes debating whether it is lawful or not.  And as the former concealed ambition or pursuit of gain under the cloak of piety, so the latter proclaimed the justice of their inactivity.”

It is this principle, of course, that explains why Kuwait was desperately oppressed enough to warrant a full-scale war, while Rwanda merited no intervention.

2 thoughts on “A 400-year-old Warning against Wars of Intervention

  1. Fascinating post Brad, thanks for sharing it. I'd be curious to know if you've got a more specific citation to back up your suggestion about the Romans liberating peoples? I've heard this defended many times, often crassly, but usually as colonialism of empire and not as liberative intervention, so I'd love to have something concrete to hang that idea on for future reference.The other interesting parallel between Christian America and Rome is the necessity of a constant standing military to defend what ends up being a situation of total war.

    Like

  2. Brad Littlejohn

    Hey Jeremy,I know it's something I've read a good deal about before, but it's hard to say now just where. I seem to recall that there's actually a lot of discussion of this phenomenon in Augustine's City of God, but perhaps not. As soon as leisure permits, though, I'll try to get back to you on this. Feel free to remind me if I forget.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s